By David Dinneen
I have been retired for over ten years, and I must admit that I have taken full advantage of not being on the front lines writing and speaking in defense of foreign language learning. When I feel moved to speak up on the subject, I do so from the admittedly comfortable position of not having to concern myself with preserving my livelihood. What does need preserving, however, is something absolutely critical to all of us: the ability of our citizens to understand the world, and to be effective, in the cross-cultural and global contexts where daily life increasingly plays out. To this end, foreign language learning is absolutely critical.
In a recent opinion piece in the New York Times, Lawrence Summers wrote that the advent of sophisticated translation technology may very well soon make the study of foreign languages an unnecessary activity in U.S. higher education. As a professor of French and of Linguistics, who earned his doctorate in Linguistics at Harvard while a member of the Machine Translation project at M.I.T., I must strongly disagree.
When students learn a foreign language, they are not only learning how to communicate in that particular tongue. As others have pointed out, and as mounting scientific evidence indicates, language learning helps significantly in making the brain more agile, more ready to learn other languages, and –equally important – to appreciate and understand related disciplines such as mathematics (especially symbolic logic) and music theory. I was contacted recently by a former student from my intensive French class at the University of Kansas who wanted to discuss, over lunch, some aspects of the business translation of Chinese. As we talked, I learned that he had moved on to other languages beyond French, including Chinese, and—more to the point here—had developed an approach to the problems that he was confronting that he believed owed much to his experiences in learning French.
He was developing software to aid businesses that wanted to enter markets in China that would help them not only with the language, but also with understanding the cultural differences. This application of language learning may seem surprising, but as I often emphasized in my teaching (and especially in training graduate teaching assistants), what we are doing when we teach language is giving students a set of materials and tools, but it is the students who will ultimately internalize the language in their own ways, making use of both its communicative aspects, and its structural and connective elements, in ways that we cannot entirely predict but that have critical and direct applications in other creative and innovative domains. In sum, the student not only learned to speak French, he also developed an understanding of the culture and recognized (perhaps later in life) the importance of both of those skills in any global interaction.
In his piece, Mr. Summers questions the need for memorization in today’s world. He states that extensive databases and highly sophisticated search tools obviate the need for humans to store large amounts of information in their brains—an obvious necessity when one learns a language (we do need to develop a vocabulary, not necessarily by using flash cards, but the fact is they help early in the game). Undoubtedly, “Google it” is a proper suggestion for a friend or student who needs some piece of information, and it often fulfills a specific need at a specific time. Still, as I know from the year I spent with the U.S. Army in Vietnam translating and interpreting for military advisers, you cannot tell your superior officer to wait a moment while you check your dictionary. Yes, the iPhone or iPad is fast, but even that momentary break in the interchange would not be acceptable in a military environment, nor I’m sure in an exchange between two business persons, nor two diplomats.
Finally, consider the example of Peter Selleck, a former Army officer who is now president of Michelin North America. Describing the value of language learning in a recent interview, he said he decided that picking up a third language was essential to his ability to communicate effectively. Speaking the language of the people in the countries where you operate, he said, is a key way to “properly demonstrate respect not only to your employees but also to your customers.” In the fast-moving and complicated world of human dialogue, nothing replaces or can replace competency in the language of your interlocutor.
David Dinneen is a retired French and Linguistics professor from the University of Kansas.
[…] Foreign Language Learning: Critical Skills for a Fast-Moving World (nafsa.org) […]
[…] Foreign Language Learning: Critical Skills for a Fast-Moving World (nafsa.org) Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. […]
I have to agree that learning a language is not only the aquirement of a skill but is also a tool to be used in understanding and showing respect to peoples of other cultures. To discontinue the necessity of learning a foriegn language in higher education would be a disservice to students and it robs them of an opportunity to exapnd their global perspective. To tell Americans that learning another peoples’ language is no longer important is terribly arrogant.
Lawrence Summers is living on another planet (a monolingual, monocultural world).
Learning a language is about learning to communicate and discovering other cultures. It is possible to be monolingual and tricultural.
Learning a language improves your native tongue (spelling, grammar, the culture behind idioms and so on). If it is deemed OK to remove foreign languages from higher education curricula, let’s see if private schools will follow suit. Chances are they will not and so the general knowledge gap between state schools and private schools will only widen.
OK technology is there to help us but what happens if you are in the countryside in Africa or Asia and you lose network coverage? Will your phone translator save the day? I think not. I believe your human interpreter will.
I feel that sometimes the misuse of technology will render us completely dependent. The human brain should not be under estimated and culture is omnipresent. If we follow Summers’ reasoning, I think we will soon say goodbye to human evolution. Everything happens through language.
Thank you for sharing!!!
Layinka
Hello Layinka,
Well written response to David Dinneen’s post. I liked your comment about being in the countryside in Africa or Asia and loosing your network coverage. I think some young people today cannot imagine a world without technology and seem to think they will always be able to rely on it. I teach nursing and in the first year of nursing, students must take a math exam which requires them to calculate medication dosages. We require that the calculations be done manually. Many students resist saying there will never be a time where they do not have their phone to use as a calculator. Well, you never know and I believe it is best to be prepared.
And I especially liked your statement, “The human brain should not be under estimated and culture is omnipresent. I would like to add that the human brain is such a marvellous organ that the more you use it the better it works.
Thanks Prof. Dinneen for mentioning China as an example of learning Chinese language and eastern culture. Chinese is my native language. I feel it is so important to understand the cultural differences, and it is not enough to learn the language itself. We improve our cross-cultural communication skills through learning foreign languages, more importantly through experiencing different cultures. This does not just happen on campus but in our personal life every single day in every aspects by interacting with people from culturally diverse backgrounds.
Learning a language is not just about vocabulary and grammar. Learning a language is learning about what another culture values, how it views the world, and how it articulates those perceptions. English can become the language of business, but English alone won’t take us to an understanding of cultural motivation or legal systems which do not accomdate English-language precepts. The legal systems I work with all have the institution and a word which translates as “contract”, but use of the English word disguises the subtle and important differences between countries’ understanding of how a contract comes into being, how it is implemented, and how it is enforced.
[…] Foreign Language Learning: Critical Skills for a Fast-Moving World (nafsa.org) […]
Very true In today’s world foreign language learning is an important aspect. Loved your post.
education business partnerships
Learning a language is definitely something of great accomplishment today, as you need it for every angle of life, or it would be very valuable to one who has acquired the skill. It is also very good t know of other cultures, give respect to one outside of one’s own. Great article!!!
Many companies understand that they benefit from having multi-lingual employees on their teams. Language and culture skills that have always proved useful for customer service, business development, sales, and general business growth are becoming mandatory components of international business. Still, many companies are unclear about which skills matter the most now, which will be important in the future, and how to develop these skills. Transparent Language speaks with many organizations on this topic and has gleaned useful insight on current and future corporate trends in the arenas of language and culture.